My dad would tell me unbelievable
stories about his childhood life in Vietnam during the Vietnam War. There was
complete chaos in the city of Saigon, weeks before the end of the Vietnam War.
People were fleeing in droves in anticipation of the impeding communist
takeover. My grandfather fought for the French army during World War Two and
was a POW in a German Nazi prisoner camp. Eventually, he came back to Vietnam
and worked as a dentist. Him and his brother were involved with the American
CIA during the Vietnam War. Being involved with the French and Americans, he
would absolutely be killed by the communists so he tried to flee South Vietnam.
However, my aunt was in pain and needed immediate medical assistance, but local
hospital immediately turned her away. The hospital was occupied mostly by wounded
South Vietnamese soldiers, and they took priority over everyone else. The only
way my aunt was to receive treatment was to bribe the doctors. However, she did
not receive any medical treatment until they arrived by boat to a U.S. military
base in Guam.
Mostly all ethical guidelines
are not adhered to during a humanitarian crisis, especially involving research.
According to an article Health Research in Humanitarian Crises: An Urgent
Global Imperative written by Kohrt, Mistry, Anand, Beecroft, and Nuwayhid in 2019;
“An individualized approach to treating patients
may create uncertainty among clinicians in navigating the complex ethical
dilemmas faced during humanitarian crises. Research during a humanitarian crisis requires modification in
methodology, multisector partnerships, engaging with available public health systems,
working with local communities, and a different method for research capacity
and multidisciplinary approaches” (Kohrt, Mistry, Anand, Beecroft, Nuwayhid, 2019).
In other words, doctors
and researchers are immensely restricted in their treatment and research in a
chaotic environment, consequently creating ethical dilemmas. Research is
especially important during a humanitarian crisis in order to better facilitate
humanitarian aid in future crisis. During a crisis, traditional research
designs are not suitable. Identifying a control group may be infeasible with no
baseline data to compare to. Limited funding also further constrains research
in these settings. This further complicates future effective humanitarian
action due to limited evidence-based research from prior crises.
Some people argue that
it is unethical to not conduct research during a crisis. Others believe
that research may actually harm affected populations. Nevertheless, achieving future
optimal humanitarian responses is nearly unachievable without the evidence-based
research that we need from the past (which there isn’t much evidence-based
research to rely on). Unfortunately, researchers may need default into using unethical
research data to help optimized humanitarian aid.
Kohrt, B. A., Mistry,
A. S., Anand, N., Beecroft, B., & Nuwayhid, I. (2019). Health research in
humanitarian crises: an urgent global imperative. BMJ global health, 4(6), e001870. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001870
No comments:
Post a Comment